Could there be a bigger about turn in views and policies?
“Science has deepened our understanding of climate change and opened new possibilities for confronting it”
– oh come on, can you cut the crap; I mean this much crap. Has Mr. Bush been living in a cave or did your scientific advisors suddenly graduate
“By the end of next year, America and other nations will set a long-term global goal for reducing greenhouse gases.” — Hahahha, nice one, oh wait, all the other nations already have it; so saying “America and other nations” doesn’t make America sound like a leader, it sounds plain idiotic
He said the US would convene a series of multilateral meetings involving the biggest polluters – including China and India – to seek agreement on a reduction target and how to achieve it.
— aha, so just include China and India as if they are the culprits so far . Just to let you know Mr. Bush, China and India may be big polluters now but it’s the western world that everyone (ie. 169 countries) agree contributed to today.
Tony Blair, British prime minister, described the US move as a “huge step forward”.
— Now this is what I call a waste of a line in an article!! Bush doing something and Blair treating it as the best thing ever since sliced bread – oh my, how new is that
Legacy hunting has taken a whole new scale, and George Bush has shown his ignorance and insulted the intelligence of the world-at-large once again.
You want my view: either US should listen to the French Ambassador tell the Chief Of Staff in the TV series, The West Wing “You are so used to calling yourself leaders of the free world. So…… lead”.
Or they should shut up