arts


One way to make use of a miserable London early-summer day (temperature: 5 degrees!) is to stay indoors and explore one of the museums. Did that yesterday, visited the Surrealism exhibition at V&A yesterday.

Surrealism seems to be very interesting; somewhere between contemporary and modern art, it can be best defined as fantasy bound loosely by reality. Think of the old woman-young woman whom do you see picture; that is surrealism. But so is a lot more things. And this exhibition takes you the stages of development nicely. On the exhibition home page link above is the photo of the lip sofa; a sofa in the shape of lips deliberately made as glassy as possible by Salvador Dali, the biggest name of the surrealist movement. There’s also the arm chair (chair with the back’s edges in the shape of arms), lobster home phone (old-style circular dial phone with a lobster as the talking piece) and jewelery representing lion’s face sprawling out diamonds.

What I really liked was how surrealism was commercialized in interesting ways; by patrons yes, but also by advertising agencies, fashion designers and interior decorators.

And then today, I put myself to work for the marketing research assignment by Bruce Hardie, one of our really-good marketing professors. Gosh, he has made me sceptical about everything! I mean everything, I wonder if I will ever believe a market research result again. But beyond all that, an interesting bit of info for those who didn’t know (I surely didn’t before this class): Research findings by Forrester, the famous and oft-quoted technology market research firm, is not believed by serious academics and professionals because they do not publish the methodology undertaken to collect the data. Only when you know the methodology can you identify biases (talking to a non-representative sample) and sampling errors (not taking a large enough sample size for the given confidence) in research, and if you can’t do that, how do you believe what they say. So much for my using their data in many, many presentations over the last two years! Oh well, well-learnt for my future.

London Business School today hosted its first Art Investment Conference ; Walid, a dear class-mate and a great guy has been raising the awareness as his personal mission over the last year and the crowd attending today was testament of his hard work.

Due to an important class presentation,  I could not attend it but we really are talking about a big crowd for an inaugural event.

Makes me think, how many of the attendees really love the art and how many want to use it for the snob value?

I have started understanding and appreciating art a little bit since shifting to London but a few days ago was my first encounter with Indian art. Professor Nirmalya Kumar gave a short talk on Jamini Roy paintings at the pre-conference dinner of India Business Forum.  Jamini Roy is considered the father of Indian modern art, and some of his mother-son  pieces in bright shades (Nirmalya owns a few that he had brought over) were riveting.

Makes me wonder, how come so few Indians, even of the”educated” ones, know anything about Indian art?